25 March 2026

LUCIEN BOUCHARD ET LA CLAUSE DEROGATOIRE

 

Alors premier ministre, devant des indicateurs nouveaux montrant pourtant des reculs inquiétants du français, il a refusé de renforcer la Loi 101.

Surtout, il l’a fait sous prétexte qu’il ne pourrait plus « se regarder dans le miroir » s’il devait invoquer la clause dérogatoire.

Parce que cette déclaration dramatique venait d’un premier ministre péquiste, le message envoyé fut d’autant plus dévastateur et durable.

https://www.journaldemontreal.com/2026/03/25/clause-derogatoire-un-enjeu-majeur-et-pancanadien

William Johnson: Canadian Multiculturalism Falsified

http://vision.williamjohnson-quebec.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Canadian-Multiculturalism-Falsified-August-10-2019-2.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3AC_CdBuY1CjOY1GRtzkjVQuebULWzEXqd0kIf2vcTWD8ZF6UA9K13h74


The Gazette’s Philip Authier got it wrong. In the edition of August 9, 2019, he wrote: “While multiculturalism is used to refer to a society where people of different cultural backgrounds live side by side without much integration...”

False. Multiculturalism, as vested in Canada’s constitution in 1982, does not isolate cultural minorities. On the contrary, it celebrates their contribution to Canada’s diverse culture. Pierre Trudeau proclaimed it as a national policy in 1971 and explained:
Canada's citizens come from almost every country in the world and bring with them every major world religion and language. This cultural diversity endows all Canadians with a great variety of human experience. The Government regards this as a heritage to treasure and believes that Canada would be poorer if we adopted assimilation programs forcing our citizens to forsake and forget the cultures they have brought to us.

Multiculturalism, as he defined it, was not to be an isolated policy. It was to be “a policy of multiculturalism within a bilingual framework.” 

    He qualified: Although there are two official languages, there is no official culture, nor does any ethnic group take precedence over any other. No citizen or group of citizens is other than Canadian and all should be treated fairly.” 


Quebec's historical traditional demands requests

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/senate-expenses-spur-outrage-but-reform-abolition-not-easily-done-1.3031249

The Quebec government has said that any talks about the Senate would have to be broadened to deal with that province's "historical requests," such as recognition of its distinctiveness and demands for more powers — the same divisive issues on which the last two constitutional ventures, the Meech Lake and Charlottetown accords, foundered. First Nations leaders would likely insist that aboriginal issues be part of the mix as well.

- approval over appointment of Quebec judges to the Supreme Court of Canada
- opting out of shared-cost programs within provincial jurisdiction, with full compensation for compatible programs
- recognition of a 'distinct society' in the Constitution of Canada
- more powers (e.g., communications)
- and a veto over constitutional amendments