Opinion: Quebec’s so-called right to self-determination
MONTREAL — The House of Commons is debating a Bloc Québécois motion
to abrogate the Clarity Act, against the backdrop of the Parti Québécois
continuing to seek “winning conditions” for another referendum. Under
the circumstances, a disinformation campaign was to be expected.
Writing in Le Devoir last week, Université de Montréal law professor
Daniel Turp — who served in Parliament as a Bloquiste and in the
National Assembly as a Péquiste — upholds Quebec’s right to secede
unilaterally, despite the contrary conclusion of the Supreme Court of
Canada.
He claims that “the adoption in 1977 of the Loi sur la consultation
populaire remains the fundamental basis for the collective right of the
Québécois nation to enact its political and constitutional future.” In
fact, the 1977 white paper that preceded and explained that bill said
exactly the opposite: “The referendums that will be held under the law
that the government intends to present would have a consultative
character. Indeed, under the present constitution, it is impossible to
confer a direct legislative power to a referendum process, because that
would go against the powers and functions that are reserved for the
lieutenant-governor. This means that, to give legal effect to a
referendum, it would be necessary to make use of the processes already
available to amend laws, whether these be constitutional in nature or
ordinary.”
01 April 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment