On
 the cusp of the adoption                                     of Bill 96
                                     by the National Assembly, many 
English community commentators have warned of the bill’s harmful 
consequences on                                     education           
                         ,                                     health, 
social services                                     and                 
                    access to justice                                   
  in English. The bill will diminish or deny Quebec anglophones the 
ability to receive these and other services in English. These criticisms
 are all meritorious. But even if somehow these provisions were watered 
down, the deleterious effects of Bill 96 would remain. This is because 
Bill 96 is greater than the sum of its parts. These parts are but tools 
by which Bill 96 will achieve its goal of public francization. 
 The objective of Bill
 96 is to make the French language the public language of Quebec, the 
language of work, leisure, culture, integration and public discourse. 
The bill achieves these objectives by legislating an overarching 
framework, within which are several discrete elements. Let’s call them 
tools. 
Under Bill 96, French is declared to be the “common language” of Quebec. In order to render it the common language, French is declared to be the pinnacle human right, subordinating all other individual liberties to the right to use the French language. For the first time, there will be a hierarchy of rights instead of the traditional level playing field and balancing between diverse human freedoms. The right to French will be the collective right of the francophone population, while any collective rights of the minority anglophone community are non-existent. The community will be left to rely on its individual liberties of freedom of speech, religion, the media and peaceful assembly, attenuated by the use of the notwithstanding clause from the Canadian Constitution.
No comments:
Post a Comment